Abstract

C1 and C1̄ activity measurements were performed with EA and EAC4 prepared with rabbit anti-Forssman IgG or IgM and were compared to measurements with EA and EAC4 prepared with mouse monoclonal IgG2b and IgM anti-DNP antibodies on cells coupled with TNP: the amount of TNP per cell was optimal for antibody activity. No differences were found in the ability of EAC4 made with poly- or monoclonal IgM to measure C 1 activity; in contrast, monoclonal IgM was capable of activating only about 30% of C1 when compared to activation by polyclonal IgM. Monoclonal vs polyclonal IgGs behaved in a similar manner but they were detecting only 50% of C1 or C 1 activity when compared to IgM of the appropriate class. It was concluded that monoclonal antibodies were capable of generating EAC4 intermediate, and that the ability of monoclonal antibodies in the EAC4 complex to bind C1 and to detect C1 activity is not significantly different from that of polyclonal antibodies but that monoclonal antibodies are less efficient in activating C1 than polyclonal antibodies.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call