Abstract

Motor imagery represents the ability to simulate anticipated movements mentally prior to their actual execution and has been proposed as a tool to assess both individuals’ perception of task difficulty as well as their perception of their own abilities. People with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) often present with motor and cognitive dysfunction, which may negatively affect motor imagery. In this cross-sectional study, we explored differences in motor imagery of walking performance between pwMS (n = 20, age = 57.1 (SD = 8.6) years, 55% female) and age- and sex-matched healthy controls (n = 20, age = 58.1 (SD = 7.0) years, 60% female). Participants underwent mental chronometry assessments, a subset of motor imagery, which evaluated the difference between imagined and actual walking times across four walking tasks of increasing difficulty (i.e., large/narrow-width walkway with/without obstacles). Raw and absolute mental chronometry (A-MC) measures were recorded in single- (ST) and dual-task (DT) conditions. In ST conditions, pwMS had higher A-MC scores across all walking conditions (p ≤ 0.031, η2 ≥ 0.119), indicating lower motor imagery ability compared to healthy controls. During DT, all participants tended to underestimate their walking ability (3.38 ± 6.72 to 5.63 ± 9.17 s). However, after physical practice, pwMS were less able to adjust their imagined walking performance compared to healthy controls. In pwMS, A-MC scores were correlated with measures of balance confidence (ρ = −0.629, p < 0.01) and the self-reported expanded disability status scale (ρ = 0.747, p < 0.01). While the current study revealed that pwMS have lower motor imagery of walking performance compared to healthy individuals, further work is necessary to examine how the disassociation between mental chronometry and actual performance relates to quality of life and well-being.

Highlights

  • Humans have the innate ability to simulate anticipated movements mentally prior to the actual execution of movements [1]

  • Mental chronometry is a subset of motor imagery which evaluates the difference between the imagined and actual times required for the execution of a given movement, wherein smaller differences are indicative of higher motor imagery ability [5,6]

  • Compared to healthy controls (HC), People with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) had higher physiological profile assessment (PPA) z-scores (2 ± 1.2 vs. 0.2 ± 0.8, p < 0.001) and lower activities-specific balance confidence (ABC) scores (73.5 ± 20.2 vs. 92.1 ± 7.2, p = 0.002), which are indicative of greater physiological fall-risk and lower balance confidence, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Humans have the innate ability to simulate anticipated movements mentally prior to the actual execution of movements [1]. This simulation is commonly termed as motor imagery (MI) and is thought to share many of the same neurocognitive structures as executed movement [2]. Based on the ability to simulate a given movement, motor imagery has been proposed as a tool to assess both individuals’ perception of task difficulty as well as their perception of their own abilities [4]. Mental chronometry is a subset of motor imagery which evaluates the difference between the imagined and actual times required for the execution of a given movement, wherein smaller differences are indicative of higher motor imagery ability [5,6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call