Motor competence assessment in young children: Convergent validity between the KTK and MOT 4-6 test batteries

Abstract

Introduction The development of motor competence in early childhood substantially contributes to successful engagement in sports and other physical activities. In view of the decreasing levels of physical activity and motor skills in children over the past decades, an appropriate assessment and monitoring of motor competence in early childhood is invaluable, for both research and practice [1] . The purpose of this study was to investigate the convergent validity between two motor competence assessment tools: the KorperkoordiantionsTest fur Kinder (KTK) and the Motoriktest fur Vier- bis Sechsjahrige Kinder (MOT 4-6). Methods Five hundred and thirty 5- and 6-year-old children (277 ♂ and 253 ♀; mean age = 5.95; SD = 0.57) were tested by practiced assessors on the KTK and MOT 4-6 during the same day. From the raw scores, a Motor Quotient was calculated based on normative data of the KTK and MOT 4-6. Results A Pearson correlation demonstrated a moderately strong positive association between KTK Motor Quotient and MOT 4-6 Motor Quotient (r = 0.605). Crosstabs showed a fair level of agreement between the two tests (K = 0.313; P Conclusion These findings provide some but limited evidence of convergent validity between KTK and MOT 4-6. The explanation for the lack of stronger associations probably lies in the different concepts that are evaluated in each test battery. The implication of this moderate level of agreement between KTK and MOT 4-6, is that practitioners and/or clinicians should be aware of possible categorisation errors when using the KTK or MOT 4-6 test to detect motor impairments.