Abstract
35 brain-damaged and normal Ss were matched in pairs. They were compared on motor strength, motor speed, psychomotor skill and tactile-perceptual function including finger localization, finger-tip number writing, and form recognition for preferred and non-preferred hands. Methods of inference utilized include: level of performance, pathognomic sign and performance of the preferred vs non-preferred hands. Brain-damaged children consistently performed more poorly than control children. Motor-performance measures showed greater deficits than did tests of tactile-perception. Each method of inference (level, sign, preferred vs non-preferred hand) was validated by the results. Combined use of these methods provided complementary information concerning differences in brain-damaged and normal children.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
