Abstract

This paper analyzes the effects of stock option incentives on inefficient investment. Specifically, based on the motive of design, we divide stock option incentives into incentive-driven and welfare-driven incentives. Our research is based on the panel data of 511 Chinese listed companies that declared stock option incentives from 2010 to 2014, including both incentive-driven and welfare-driven incentives. Our research shows that different types of stock option incentives have different effects on inefficient investment. Generally, incentive-driven stock option incentives reduce inefficient investment, whereas welfare-driven stock option incentives do not reduce inefficient investment, but increase it. However, there is a weakening effect in state-owned enterprises due to two opposite factors, numerous restrictions and more self-interested managers. Additionally, the paper provides implications that some stock options are manipulated by managers in the designing stage in order to pursue self-interests, and therefore monitoring abnormal share price movement and performance hurdles is important to safeguard the wealth of shareholders and promote effective motivation for managers.

Highlights

  • Agency problems are among the corporate governance problems many big companies face [1]

  • We classify stock option incentives into incentive-driven and welfare-driven based on cumulative abnormal return (CAR) before the declaration date

  • It can be concluded that incentive-driven stock option incentives can reduce inefficient investment, whereas welfare-drive stock option incentives cannot reduce inefficient investment, and can even increase inefficient investment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Agency problems are among the corporate governance problems many big companies face [1]. Agency problems between managers and shareholders can cause many problems, one of which is inefficient investment [2]. Managers may invest in projects for their own interests, not for shareholders’ interests [3]. Under a rational and perfect information market assumption, firms invest efficiently in projects with positive net present value (NPV) [4]. In practice, efficiency is different for each investment. Investments with low efficiency are called inefficient investments. Inefficient investments include overinvestment and underinvestment, both of which reflect suboptimal investment decisions

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call