Motivational orientation and risk taking in elite winter climbers: A qualitative study

Abstract

Objectives: High-risk sports participants have typically been viewed as a homogeneous group despite variability in performance characteristics and the level of risk undertaken. Prolonged engagement high-risk sports such as winter climbing are relatively underserved within current literature. Elite winter climbers attempt climbs that are outside the scope of the current “known”, i.e. unclimbed routes. The majority of the current understanding of motivation in high-risk sports is based on quantitative research and the methodologies and instruments used. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of elite winter climbers and gain a richer understanding of their motivational orientation and risk-taking behaviour. Design: Qualitative–inductive. Method: Four elite male winter climbers (aged 42–49 years old) took part in semi-structured interviews and explore their motivational orientation and risk-taking behaviour. A thematic analysis was used. Results: Two superordinate themes of enactive mastery and engendered disinhibition emerged from the data. Enactive mastery was interpreted as a composite of two higher-order themes: Task mastery and self-mastery. Engendered disinhibition was interpreted as a composite of two higher-order themes: Social cognitive appraisal and self-perception. Conclusion: Enactive mastery and engendered disinhibition emerged as key behavioural and psychological determinants that influenced individuals to attempt more difficult and riskier forms of winter climbing. Goal achievement was their primary motive which was set within a confidence frame encapsulated within these superordinate themes.