Abstract

Previous studies have associated several variables concerning motivation and other domains with underachievement, i. e. a student's academic achievement falling short of what their cognitive abilities, as the best predictor of academic performance, would indicate. The present study extends these findings using a more rigorous approach in defining underachievers and suitable control groups. Using discriminant analysis, underachievers identified in a German twin family study were compared not only to achievers with comparable IQ scores, but also with students of lower aptitude, but comparably low grades, as well as overachieving students. Results confirm previous findings that compared to successful students, underachievers report lower levels of motivation and parental support; beyond this comparison, underachievers also differed from other low achievers, mostly in terms of their personality. In total, 40% of the variance between the groups were explained. Additionally, the data shed doubt on the common assumption that underachievers are an unusually heterogenous group of students.

Highlights

  • 1.1 General backgroundGeneral intelligence has long been known as a major predictor of academic achievement (Sternberg, Gigorenko & Bundy, 2001), with a recent meta-analysis reporting a median correlation of 0.54 (Roth et al, 2015)

  • We focus on two particular domains: motivation and personality

  • TwinLife did not include a direct measure of self-regulation in the first data wave; our proxy for successful self-regulatory behavior necessary as a further link to academic achievement according to the AOM was hyperactivity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

General intelligence has long been known as a major predictor of academic achievement (Sternberg, Gigorenko & Bundy, 2001), with a recent meta-analysis reporting a median correlation of 0.54 (Roth et al, 2015). M. Spinath substantial predictive validity, which was corrected for sampling error, error of measurement and range restriction, implies that about three quarters of the variance in the outcome are still left unexplained. A substantial body of research has attempted to uncover other predictors of educational attainment

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call