Abstract

Animals can efficiently process sensory stimuli whose attributes vary over orders of magnitude by devoting specific neural pathways to process specific features in parallel. Weakly electric fish offer an attractive model system as electrosensory pyramidal neurons responding to amplitude modulations of their self‐generated electric field are organized into three parallel maps of the body surface. While previous studies have shown that these fish use parallel pathways to process stationary stimuli, whether a similar strategy is used to process motion stimuli remains unknown to this day. We recorded from electrosensory pyramidal neurons in the weakly electric fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus across parallel maps of the body surface (centromedial, centrolateral, and lateral) in response to objects moving at velocities spanning the natural range. Contrary to previous observations made with stationary stimuli, we found that all cells responded in a similar fashion to moving objects. Indeed, all cells showed a stronger directionally nonselective response when the object moved at a larger velocity. In order to explain these results, we built a mathematical model incorporating the known antagonistic center–surround receptive field organization of these neurons. We found that this simple model could quantitatively account for our experimentally observed differences seen across E and I‐type cells across all three maps. Our results thus provide strong evidence against the hypothesis that weakly electric fish use parallel neural pathways to process motion stimuli and we discuss their implications for sensory processing in general.

Highlights

  • Animals must efficiently process incoming sensory stimuli with widely varying intensities using sensory neurons with very limited output ranges in order to successfully interact with their environment

  • There are two types of ELL pyramidal neurons within each map: E cells respond with increasing firing rate while I cells respond with decreasing firing rate to increases in EOD amplitude and are analogous to the ON- and OFF-type cells found in other systems, respectively

  • Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Animals must efficiently process incoming sensory stimuli with widely varying intensities using sensory neurons with very limited output ranges in order to successfully interact with their environment. Gymnotiform wave-type weakly electric fish generate quasi-sinusoidal electric fields through the electric organ discharge and monitor perturbations through electroreceptors scattered on their skin (Chacron et al 2011). These perturbations cast electric images onto the skin where tuberous electroreceptor organs respond to changes in EOD amplitude and contact pyramidal neurons in the electrosensory lateral line lobe (ELL) (Scheich et al 1973). Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.