Abstract

The detection of visual motion requires temporal delays to compare current with earlier visual input. Models of motion detection assume that these delays reside in separate classes of slow and fast thalamic cells, or slow and fast synaptic transmission. We used a data-driven modeling approach to generate a model that instead uses recurrent network dynamics with a single, fixed temporal integration window to implement the velocity computation. This model successfully reproduced the temporal response dynamics of a population of motion sensitive neurons in macaque middle temporal area (MT) and its constituent parts matched many of the properties found in the motion processing pathway (e.g., Gabor-like receptive fields (RFs), simple and complex cells, spatially asymmetric excitation and inhibition). Reverse correlation analysis revealed that a simplified network based on first and second order space-time correlations of the recurrent model behaved much like a feedforward motion energy (ME) model. The feedforward model, however, failed to capture the full speed tuning and direction selectivity properties based on higher than second order space-time correlations typically found in MT. These findings support the idea that recurrent network connectivity can create temporal delays to compute velocity. Moreover, the model explains why the motion detection system often behaves like a feedforward ME network, even though the anatomical evidence strongly suggests that this network should be dominated by recurrent feedback.

Highlights

  • Successful interaction with a dynamic environment requires a neural mechanism for the detection of motion

  • Even though the LN model is a considerable oversimplification of area middle temporal area (MT), we have previously shown that this method can successfully generate quantitative descriptions of receptive field properties in area MT (Hartmann et al, 2011; Richert et al, 2013)

  • A recurrent network can compute a representation of velocity in much the same way as the motion energy (ME) model, but without the need for separate classes of fast and slow neurons or synapses

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Successful interaction with a dynamic environment requires a neural mechanism for the detection of motion. The primate visual system does contain a class of slower neurons (the parvocellular stream), but the evidence that they are a critical component in motion detection (Malpeli et al, 1981; Nealey and Maunsell, 1994; DeValois and Cottaris, 1998; De Valois et al, 2000) is controversial. A biophysically realistic model of motion detection (Maex and Orban, 1996) ascribes the temporal delays to intrinsic differences between slow and fast synaptic transmission. Such intrinsic differences are fixed, and it is difficult to see how they alone can account for the observed wide range of preferred speeds (see Section Discussion)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.