Abstract

BackgroundWe tested the hypothesis that optimum-contribution selection (OCS) with restrictions imposed during optimisation realises most of the long-term genetic gain realised by OCS without restrictions.MethodsWe used stochastic simulation to estimate long-term rates of genetic gain realised by breeding schemes that applied OCS without and with restrictions imposed during optimisation, where long-term refers to generations 23 to 25 (approximately). Six restrictions were imposed. Five of these removed solutions from the solution space. The sixth removed records of selection decisions made at earlier selection times. We also simulated a conventional breeding scheme with truncation selection as a reference point. Generations overlapped, selection was for a single trait, and the trait was observed for all selection candidates prior to selection.ResultsOCS with restrictions realised 67 to 99% of the additional gain realised by OCS without restrictions, where additional gain was the difference in the long-term rates of genetic gain realised by OCS without restrictions and our reference point with truncation selection. The only exceptions were those restrictions that removed all solutions near the optimum solution from the solution space and the restriction that removed records of selection decisions made at earlier selection times. Imposing these restrictions realised only −12 to 46% of the additional gain.ConclusionsMost of the long-term genetic gain realised by OCS without restrictions can be realised by OCS with restrictions imposed during optimisation, provided the restrictions do not remove all solutions near the optimum from the solution space and do not remove records of earlier selection decisions. In breeding schemes where OCS cannot be applied optimally because of biological and logistical restrictions, OCS with restrictions provides a useful alternative. Not only does it realise most of the long-term genetic gain, OCS with restrictions enables OCS to be tailored to individual breeding schemes.

Highlights

  • We tested the hypothesis that optimum-contribution selection (OCS) with restrictions imposed during optimisation realises most of the long-term genetic gain realised by OCS without restrictions

  • Based on this line of reasoning, we hypothesised that OCS with restrictions imposed during optimisation will realise most of the long-term genetic gain realised by OCS without restrictions

  • Procedure We used stochastic simulation to estimate long-term rates of genetic gain realised by OCS without and with restrictions imposed during optimisation, where longterm refers to generations 23 to 25

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We tested the hypothesis that optimum-contribution selection (OCS) with restrictions imposed during optimisation realises most of the long-term genetic gain realised by OCS without restrictions. One way to make OCS more practical is to impose restrictions on OCS during optimisation Would this make OCS decisions readily applicable to individual breeding schemes, it may even realise most, if not all, of the long-term genetic gain realised by OCS without restrictions for two reasons. OCS is able to correct for selection decisions made at earlier selection times by taking into account that some selection candidates and ancestral animals have already generated offspring [3,5] Based on this line of reasoning, we hypothesised that OCS with restrictions imposed during optimisation will realise most of the long-term genetic gain realised by OCS without restrictions. We simulated breeding schemes with restrictions that were inspired by, but not unique, to pig breeding

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.