Abstract

The correct identification of mosquito vectors is often hampered by the presence of morphologically indiscernible sibling species. The Maculipennis complex is one of these groups that include both malaria vectors of primary importance and species of low/negligible epidemiological relevance, of which distribution data in Italy are outdated. Our study was aimed at providing an updated distribution of Maculipennis complex in Northern Italy through the sampling and morphological/molecular identification of specimens from five regions. The most abundant species was Anopheles messeae (2032), followed by Anopheles maculipennis s.s. (418), Anopheles atroparvus (28) and Anopheles melanoon (13). Taking advantage of ITS2 barcoding, we were able to finely characterize tested mosquitoes, classifying all the Anopheles messeae specimens as Anopheles daciae, a taxon with debated rank to which we referred as species inquirenda (sp. inq.). The distribution of species was characterized by Ecological Niche Models (ENMs), fed by recorded points of presence. ENMs provided clues on the ecological preferences of the detected species, with An. daciae sp. inq. linked to stable breeding sites and An. maculipennis s.s. more associated to ephemeral breeding sites. We demonstrate that historical Anopheles malaria vectors are still present in Northern Italy.

Highlights

  • The correct identification of mosquito vectors is often hampered by the presence of morphologically indiscernible sibling species

  • This study provides detailed data on the distribution of species of the Maculipennis complex in Northern Italy, filling the gap in the knowledge gathered over the last decades

  • The use of the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) marker allowed the identification of An. daciae sp. inq., An. maculipennis s.s. and the rarer

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The correct identification of mosquito vectors is often hampered by the presence of morphologically indiscernible sibling species. Our study was aimed at providing an updated distribution of Maculipennis complex in Northern Italy through the sampling and morphological/. Attempts to find other diagnostic characters to separate the species complex were undertaken with particular attention to chaetotaxy in larvae and male genitalia. These characters frequently partially overlap between different s­ pecies[3], making morphological identification inconclusive. Two of the main malaria vectors in historical times in Italy, Anopheles labranchiae Falleroni, 1926, and Anopheles sacharovi Favre, 1903, belonged to the Maculipennis ­complex[4].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call