MOSES™ pulse modulation technology versus conventional pulse delivery technology: the effect on irrigation fluid temperature during flexible ureteroscopy.

Abstract

To compare the effect of MOSES™ modulation technology to conventional pulse delivery technology on the irrigation fluid temperature (IFT) under different irrigation conditions during flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) in a live-anesthetized porcine model. For this experiment was used one female pig. A percutaneous access was obtained and a 30Fr sheath was placed inside the upper calyceal system. A thermocouple was inserted through the sheath to the upper calyx to record the effect on IFT during FURS. A Lumenis 120H Ho:YAG laser was used and the IFT was recorded during laser activation for 30s at a laser power of 20W, 40W and 60W under gravity and manual pump irrigation using MOSES™ and conventional pulse delivery technology. In the highest power settings the maximum IFT was achieved in 18s under gravity irrigation (66.4°C). It seems that there is no significant difference on IFT between MOSES and conventional mode on the IFT under different irrigation conditions during FURS at 20W, 40W and 60W power settings. Furthermore, our results indicate that under manual pumping even high-power settings (40W, 60W) can be performed with safety. In the in vivo model, the MOSES™ pulse delivery technology does not have a significant difference in the maximal IFT in comparison to conventional pulse delivery technology during FURS in the same power settings. Manual pumping should be used to keep the IFT within safe limits.