Abstract
Economic evaluation of policies regarding out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is important. The value of a statistical life (VSL) for OHCA victims is the most important component in a cost-benefit analysis of interventions that have the possibility to reduce mortality from this cause. This value is not known. We use responses to a national Swedish mail survey, based on the stated-preference technique to directly elicit individuals’ hypothetical willingness to pay for a reduced risk of dying from OHCA. A lower-bound estimate of VSL for OHCA would be in range of SEK 30 to 50 million. The value is found to be higher than for comparable VSL estimates from the transport sector, even though individuals who suffer OHCAs are generally older and less healthy than people who die in road traffic accidents. The results indicate that it is not an overestimation to use the ‘baseline’ VSL value from the transport sector (SEK 24 million) in cost-benefit analysis of OHCA policy decisions and that the cause of death is important when examining willingness to pay for death risk reductions. We do not support a general declining VSL due to the age of the victims, i.e. a ‘senior death discount’, for this cause of death.Published: Online January 2017. In print December 2017.
Highlights
Establishing a monetary value of a human statistical life (VSL) is a sensitive issue in several aspects
Our results show that a conservative value of a statistical life (VSL) for of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) would be in the range of Swedish kronor (SEK) 30 to 50 million, which is higher than the official VSL for road traffic safety in Sweden
This result is interesting in two respects: (1) we do not support a ‘senior death discount’ for this cause of death, and (2) we can give a recommendation about a policy VSL for OHCA
Summary
Establishing a monetary value of a human statistical life (VSL) is a sensitive issue in several aspects. The human capital approach equates the value of a human life to the discounted market value of the output produced by an individual over an expected lifetime, but the value does not account for output outside the workplace. The old, the poor, the disabled, the sick or those with any other personal attribute that may decrease their ‘productivity’ would have reduced VSL values. This could lead to that we would ignore expenses that reduce the risk of dying for individuals whose value do not cover their cost of living.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.