Abstract

Recent evidence for the influence of morphological structure on the phonetic output goes unexplained by established models of speech production and by theories of the morphology-phonology interaction. Linear discriminative learning (LDL) is a recent computational approach in which such effects can be expected. We predict the acoustic duration of 4,530 English derivative tokens with the morphological functions DIS, NESS, LESS, ATION, and IZE in natural speech data by using predictors derived from a linear discriminative learning network. We find that the network is accurate in learning speech production and comprehension, and that the measures derived from it are successful in predicting duration. For example, words are lengthened when the semantic support of the word's predicted articulatory path is stronger. Importantly, differences between morphological categories emerge naturally from the network, even when no morphological information is provided. The results imply that morphological effects on duration can be explained without postulating theoretical units like the morpheme, and they provide further evidence that LDL is a promising alternative for modeling speech production.

Highlights

  • Recent findings in morpho-phonetic and psycholinguistic research have indicated that phonetic detail can vary by morphological structure

  • This study set out to explore how morphological effects on the phonetic output, which have been frequently observed in the literature, can be explained

  • Our study investigated whether we can successfully model the durations of English derivatives with a new psycho-computational approach, linear discriminative learning

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent findings in morpho-phonetic and psycholinguistic research have indicated that phonetic detail can vary by morphological structure. The observation that phonetic detail varies systematically with morphological properties is unaccounted for by traditional and current models of the morphology-phonology interaction and of speech production (e.g., Chomsky and Halle, 1968; Kiparsky, 1982; Dell, 1986; Levelt et al, 1999; Roelofs and Ferreira, 2019; Turk and Shattuck-Hufnagel, 2020) This is because these models are either underspecified regarding the Modeling Derivative Durations With LDL processing of complex words, or do not allow for post-lexical access of morphological information. No morphological information is encoded in these templates, meaning that no systematic differences between morphological properties are expected at the phonetic level

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call