Year-end Sale % OFF 
Abstract

 
 
 Teeth are the most common element in the fossil record and play a critical role in taxonomic assessments. Variability in extant hominoid species is commonly used as a basis to gauge expected ranges of variability in fossil hominin species. In this study, variability in lower first molars is visualised in morphospace for four extant hominoid species and seven fossil hominin species. A size-versus-shape-based principle component analysis plot was used to recognise spatial patterns applicable to sexual dimorphism in extant species for comparison with fossil hominin species. In three African great ape species, variability occurs predominantly according to size (rather than shape), with the gorilla sample further separating into a male and a female group according to size. A different pattern is apparent for the modern human sample, in which shape variability is more evident. There is overlap between male and female modern humans and some evidence of grouping by linguistic/tribal populations. When fossil hominin species are analysed using equivalent axes of variance, the specimens group around species holotypes in quite similar patterns to those of the extant African great apes, but six individual fossil molars fall well outside of polygons circumscribing holotype clusters; at least three of these specimens are of interest for discussion in the context of sexual dimorphism, species variability and current species classifications. An implication of this study is that, especially in the case of modern humans, great caution needs to be exercised in using extant species as analogues for assessing variability considered to be a result of sexual dimorphism in fossil hominin species.
 
 
 
 
 Significance: 
 
 
 
 Caution should be exercised in using modern analogue species as proxies for fossil hominin species variability.
 Exceptionally wide ranges of molar variability between certain fossil hominin specimens currently allocated to the same species might indicate possible misclassification.
 Molar morphology in gorillas tends to reflect primarily size, rather than shape, variability between the sexes, which is a consideration in the context of assessing possible sexual dimorphism in fossil hominin species. 
 
 
 
Highlights
The aim of the present study was to test the predictions (1) that sexual dimorphism should be observable between lower first molars of male and female Gorilla gorilla gorilla, primarily according to size; (2) that variability between lower first molars of male and female modern humans may follow a different pattern in morphospace to that of African great ape species, possibly being observable primarily along biogeographical lines, and only secondarily according to sex; and (3) that certain specimens in the fossil hominin record may appear as outliers from the typical individuals of their species, raising the possibility of misclassification
Two-dimensional imagery was chosen for the study because holotypes of certain of the fossil hominin species were extremely worn (e.g. Au. afarensis and P. boisei), and would not have been able to be included in a three-dimensional analysis, but these specimens were still usable in a study relying on landmark analyses wherein homologous cusp intersections at the perimeter of the occlusal crown view were still discernible
Sexual dimorphism is not evident even within the highly sexually dimorphic gorilla sample in the shape-only analysis, which suggests that lower first molars of male and female gorillas do not vary significantly in their shape
Summary
Previous research has established that analyses of dental metrics and morphology on the post-canine dentition of extant hominoids are reasonably successful at differentiating between specimens at the species level and even at the subspecies/regional level.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7] Likewise, in the fossil hominin context, molar crown size, shape and cusp arrangements have traditionally been used as diagnostic tools to help to identify specimens attributed to different species of Australopithecus, Paranthropus and Homo.[8,9,10,11,12,13,14] taxonomic decisions cannot always be made with accuracy, when the fossil record is incomplete, and boundaries between species are sometimes very indistinct.[15] It is common to use observed variability ranges in extant species as proxies for the quantification of expected variability in similar fossil species (for example, extant hominoids are often used as analogues for extinct hominins), but some caution needs to be observed in doing so.[16] Certain species, such as gorillas and orangutans, are known to be highly sexually dimorphic In terms of their dental morphometrics, Uchida[1,2] has noted that teeth vary greatly in size between the sexes, there are no significant differences between male and female gorillas and orangutans in terms of molar shape, in the context of their mean shape indices and cusp proportions. In the case of modern Homo sapiens, size differences are known to occur along regional or biogeographical lines, and there may be regional variability and some sexual dimorphism in each region, certain groups globally have extremely large (‘megadont’) molars, while other groups have very small (‘microdont’) teeth by comparison.[17,18,19]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
