Abstract
The current paper describes the effect of key operating variables (i.e. pH, presence of sodium sulfate, boric acid and sodium lauryl sulfate – SLS) on important features of nickel deposits by means of morphologic and surface roughness analyses and indentation hardness tests. Two substrates (cathodes) were used: 316L stainless steel (SS) or titanium (grade 2). Only changes of pH and additions of Na2SO4 and SLS to the electrolyte largely affected the morphology of the deposits, regardless of substrate type. At pH3, a condition in which relatively high values of current efficiencies were obtained, the addition of 155.9g L−1 of Na2SO4 or 10mg L−1 of SLS to the electrolyte lead to the production of Ni deposits with few hydrogen pits on the surface and regular edges. However, the presence of 155.9g L−1 of Na2SO4 in the electrolyte caused an increase of the average roughness of the deposits in the order of 27 and 54% when 316L SS or Ti cathodes were used, respectively. By adding 10mg L−1 of SLS to electrolyte containing 155.9g·L−1 of Na2SO4 and 8g L−1 of H3BO3, the surface roughness decreased about 24 and 17% when 316L SS or Ti cathodes were used, respectively, without any effect on the materials' microhardness. The results of this work suggest that only the replacement of 316L SS blank cathodes by Ti may not represent significant benefits in terms of product quality.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
