Abstract

In recent years the nature and the role of a morphological component in NLP systems has attracted a lot of attention.The two-level model of Koskenniemi which relates graphemic to morphological structure has been succesfully implemented in the form of finite state automata.In EUROTRA a solution which combines morphological and surface syntactic processing in one CFG implemented in a unification grammar framework has been tried out. This article contrasts these two approaches considering especially the feasibility of building morphological modules for a big multilingual MT system in a decentralised R & D project.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call