Abstract

The supercapacitive properties of Co3O4 nanocrystalline powders with two different morphologies synthesized by coprecipitation (referred to as Co3O4–C) and hydrothermal (referred to as Co3O4-H) methods were compared and studied. The samples were analyzed for their phase purity, crystal structure, surface morphology, and surface area. Both samples were found to be single-phase nanostructures with a normal spinel-type cubic crystal structure (space group Fd3¯m), as indicated by Raman and XRD (X-ray diffraction) data analyses. TEM (Transmission electron microscopy) images clearly show that the Co3O4–C sample exhibits spherical particles with a mean size of 10 nm. On the other hand, the Co3O4–H sample shows a flower-like assembly of particles. The Co3O4–C sample has a higher specific surface area than the Co3O4-H sample due to its smaller particle size. XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) data were collected to analyze the chemical states and cation distribution of the samples, revealing a 2:1 ratio of Co3+ and Co2+ in both samples. Both samples displayed pseudocapacitive behaviour in CV (cyclic voltammetry) and GCD (galvanostatic charge–discharge) analyses. Despite having a smaller surface area, the Co3O4–H electrode exhibited a higher CS (specific capacitance) compared to the Co3O4–C electrode at all current densities when tested using 1 M KOH electrolyte. At a specific current density (0.5 A/g), the Cs values for Co3O4–C and Co3O4–H are found to be 366 F/g and 233 F/g, respectively. As the current density increases, the specific capacitance of both electrodes decreases, but this reduction is more prominent for Co3O4-C than Co3O4-H. The study indicates that besides surface area, the morphology of the sample also plays a crucial role in determining the capacitance of a material.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call