Abstract

Bats play important ecological roles in tropical systems, yet how these communities are structured is still poorly understood. Our study explores the structure of African bat communities using morphological characters to define the morphospace occupied by these bats and stable isotope analysis to define their dietary niche breadth. We compared two communities, one in rainforest (Liberia) and one in savannah (South Africa), and asked whether the greater richness in the rainforest was due to more species ‘packing’ into the same morphospace and trophic space than bats from the savannah, or some other arrangement. In the rainforest, bats occupied a larger area in morphospace and species packing was higher than in the savannah; although this difference disappeared when comparing insectivorous bats only. There were also differences in morphospace occupied by different foraging groups (aerial, edge, clutter and fruitbat). Stable isotope analysis revealed that the range of δ13C values was almost double in rainforest than in savannah indicating a greater range of utilization of basal C3 and C4 resources in the former site, covering primary productivity from both these sources. The ranges in δ15N, however, were similar between the two habitats suggesting a similar number of trophic levels. Niche breadth, as defined by either standard ellipse area or convex hull, was greater for the bat community in rainforest than in savannah, with all four foraging groups having larger niche breadths in the former than the latter. The higher inter-species morphospace and niche breadth in forest bats suggest that species packing is not necessarily competitive. By employing morphometrics and stable isotope analysis, we have shown that the rainforest bat community packs more species in morphospace and uses a larger niche breadth than the one in savannah.

Highlights

  • Species richness is not evenly distributed across the landscape, but changes in relation to a variety of factors such as latitude, altitude and climate [1]

  • The mean distance to the nearest neighbour was significantly shorter for the rainforest bat community (Nimba) than for the savannah community (Soutpansberg), indicating higher species packing in morphospace at the rainforest site

  • The morphospace area was 50% larger for the rainforest bat community compared with the savannah community, but they were similar when fruitbats were removed from the analysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Species richness is not evenly distributed across the landscape, but changes in relation to a variety of factors such as latitude, altitude and climate [1]. As a primary resource, is often the focus of such niche partitioning studies [16], and recent advances in stable isotope analyses have allowed novel insights into niche breadth and other dietary parameters that were previously difficult to study [15,17,18,19,20] Since bats manipulate their prey or food item with their mouths, the structure of bat skulls may indicate the morphological space (morphospace) occupied by a particular community [21]. Various studies have shown that ecological (including trophic) relationships within animal communities can be based on relevant morphological characters [16,22,23] These ecomorphological traits can be used to calculate indices of ‘species packing’ within a community, allowing for comparisons between communities [24]. Species packing refers to how different species occupy morphospace which may be used to compare between communities

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call