Abstract

While it has been demonstrated that even subtle variation in human facial expressions can lead to significant changes in the meaning and function of expressions, relatively few studies have examined primate facial expressions using similarly objective and rigorous analysis. Construction of primate facial expression repertoires may, therefore, be oversimplified, with expressions often arbitrarily pooled and/or split into subjective pigeonholes. Our objective is to assess whether subtle variation in primate facial expressions is linked to variation in function, and hence to inform future attempts to quantify complexity of facial communication. We used Macaque Facial Action Coding System, an anatomically based and hence more objective tool, to quantify "silent bared-teeth" (SBT) expressions produced by wild crested macaques engaging in spontaneous behavior, and utilized discriminant analysis and bootstrapping analysis to look for morphological differences between SBT produced in four different contexts, defined by the outcome of interactions: Affiliation, Copulation, Play, and Submission. We found that SBT produced in these contexts could be distinguished at significantly above-chance rates, indicating that the expressions produced in these four contexts differ morphologically. We identified the specific facial movements that were typically used in each context, and found that the variability and intensity of facial movements also varied between contexts. These results indicate that nonhuman primate facial expressions share the human characteristic of exhibiting meaningful subtle differences. Complexity of facial communication may not be accurately represented simply by building repertoires of distinct expressions, so further work should attempt to take this subtle variability into account.

Highlights

  • It is widely believed that some human facial expressions are homologous to similar facial movement patterns in other primates, with a popular comparison being that of the human smile to the “silent bared-teeth” expression produced by most primates (Preuschoft, 1992, 2000; van Hooff, 1967, 1972)

  • We found that silent bared-teeth” (SBT) expressions produced in different contexts were discriminated successfully above chance level, using a robust randomization procedure

  • Expressions produced in some contexts were characterized by particular action unit (AU) or action descriptor (AD), while other distinctions were made using measurements of the intensity of AUs, and the overall variability of expression sequences

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is widely believed that some human facial expressions are homologous to similar facial movement patterns in other primates, with a popular comparison being that of the human smile to the “silent bared-teeth” expression (hereafter, SBT; van Hooff, 1967) produced by most primates (Preuschoft, 1992, 2000; van Hooff, 1967, 1972). While a useful first step in testing the influence of social factors on the evolution of communication, with a specific focus on facial expressions, this approach is coarse and subjective, requiring pigeonholing facial communicative signals and displays into discrete categories This is contrary to evidence, for example, that not all primate SBT appear the same: the mandrill (Mandrillus sphinx) has a distinct morphological variant of the expression (van Hooff, 1967); whereas in tonkean macaques (Macaca tonkeana), SBT and relaxed open-mouth (van Hooff, 1967) expressions appear to occur not as discrete signals but as a graded continuum (Thierry, Demaria, Preuschoft, & Desportes, 1989). Few such detailed studies of the connection of form to function of primate facial expressions have yet been undertaken, with some studies finding that SBT performs multiple functions but neglecting to examine the form of the expression in detail

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call