Abstract

According to the currently dominant view, cognitive science is a study of mind and intelligence focused on computational models of knowledge in humans. It is described in terms of symbol manipulation over formal language. This approach is connected with a variety of unsolvable problems, as pointed out by Thagard. In this paper, I argue that the main reason for the inadequacy of the traditional view of cognition is that it detaches the body of a human as the cognizing agent from the higher-level abstract knowledge generation. It neglects the dynamical aspects of cognitive processes, emotions, consciousness, and social aspects of cognition. It is also uninterested in other cognizing agents such as other living beings or intelligent machines. Contrary to the traditional computationalism in cognitive science, the morphological computation approach offers a framework that connects low-level with high-level approaches to cognition, capable of meeting challenges listed by Thagard. To establish this connection, morphological computation generalizes the idea of computation from symbol manipulation to natural/physical computation and the idea of cognition from the exclusively human capacity to the capacity of all goal-directed adaptive self-reflective systems, living organisms as well as robots. Cognition is modeled as a layered process, where at the lowest level, systems acquire data from the environment, which in combination with the already stored data in the morphology of an agent, presents the basis for further structuring and self-organization of data into information and knowledge.

Highlights

  • According to the currently dominant view, cognitive science is a study of mind and intelligence focused on computational models of knowledge in humans

  • According to the currently dominant view, cognitive science is a study of mind and intelligence, focused on knowledge generation in humans

  • Under this traditional framing of cognitive science, the process of cognition is understood as computation over mental representations, that is a hypothetical internal cognitive mechanism manipulating concepts, ideas, and thoughts, all of which are vaguely defined abstract concepts described by symbols and their combinations without clear physicochemical equivalents

Read more

Summary

Cognition and Intelligence

According to the currently dominant view, cognitive science is a study of mind and intelligence, focused on knowledge generation in humans. There, the connection is still missing between the high-level view of cognition as studying thoughts, mind, and intelligence as computational symbol manipulation, and the low-level view seeing each living organism, no matter how simple, as a cognizing system, where cognition stands for very physicochemical processes of life In this context, intelligence is seen as a subset of cognition, the ability of an agent to solve problems, which includes learning, reasoning, planning information storage and retrieval, and related processes. After noticing limitations of the present view of cognition, Thagard [1,2] proposed an extension of the idea of “thinking” to include—apart from traditional ones involved in perception, problem solving, learning, decision-making, and language—the emotional experience This addition bridges some of the distance between cognition as rational symbol-manipulating computing and its embodiment, but the basic problems remain regarding generative mechanisms that can dynamically connect cognition with its substrate, relating mind and matter. It is in use in specialized research communities and it is not yet part of the widely received view

Morphological Computation in Robotics and General Morphological Computation
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call