Abstract

Minnows of the genus Phoxinus are promising candidates to investigate adaptive divergence, as they inhabit both still and running waters of a variety of altitudes and climatic zones in Europe. We used landmark‐based geometric morphometric methods to quantify the level of morphological variability in Phoxinus populations from streams and lakes of Northern Italy and the Danube basin. We analyzed body shape differences of populations in the dorsal, lateral, and ventral planes, using a large array of landmarks and semilandmarks. As the species identification of Phoxinus on morphological characters is ambiguous, we used two mitochondrial genes to determine the genetic background of the samples and to ensure we are comparing homogenous groups. We have found significant body shape differences between habitats: Minnow populations inhabiting streams had a deeper body and caudal peduncle and more laterally inserted pectoral fins than minnows inhabiting lakes. We have also found significant body shape differences between genetic groups: Italian minnows had deeper bodies, deeper and shorter caudal peduncles, and a shorter and wider gape than both groups from the Danube. Our results show that the morphology of Phoxinus is highly influenced by habitat and that body shape variation between habitats was within the same range as between genetic groups. These morphological differences are possibly linked to different modes of swimming and foraging in the respective habitats and are likely results of phenotypic plasticity. However, differences in shape and interlandmark distances between the groups suggest that some (though few) morphometric characters might be useful for separating Phoxinus species.

Highlights

  • Many fish species are able to thrive in different types of water bodies with varying environmental parameters (Ehlinger & Wilson, 1988; Webb, 1984)

  • We focused on minnows of Northern Italy and the Danube basin, which currently belong to two species, Phoxinus lumaireul and Phoxinus phoxinus, respectively

  • To justify the groupings from a morphological point of view, we looked at each population individually and generally found that intragroup variation was smaller than intergroup variation and that populations from the same habitat and genetic group share similar body shapes

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Many fish species are able to thrive in different types of water bodies with varying environmental parameters (Ehlinger & Wilson, 1988; Webb, 1984). | 573 contrasting habitats, such as benthic versus pelagic zone (Kahilainen et al, 2011; McPhail, 1993; Præbel et al, 2013; Willacker, von Hippel, Wilton, & Walton, 2010), or in lakes versus streams (Berner, Grandchamp, & Hendry, 2009; Brinsmead & Fox, 2002; Sharpe, Räsänen, Berner, & Hendry, 2008), often exhibit adaptive differences These concern locomotion (Brinsmead & Fox, 2002; McGuigan, Franklin, Moritz, & Blows, 2003; Sharpe et al, 2008) and foraging morphology (Berner, Adams, Grandchamp, & Hendry, 2008; Kahilainen et al, 2011). Our aims were to (1) assess morphological differentiation between genetically homogeneous minnow populations inhabiting lakes and streams; (2) assess morphological divergence between genetically different populations inhabiting similar habitats; and (3) compare the extent of morphological differences between habitats and genetic groups

| Ethical statement
15 Σ ndorsal 30 17 25 24 nlateral 30 17 22 15 nventral 30 17 24 23
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call