Abstract

Bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Bombus) are important pollinators and models for studying mechanisms underlying developmental plasticity, such as factors influencing size, immunity, and social behaviors. Research on such processes, as well as expanding use of gene-manipulation and gene expression technologies, requires a detailed understanding of how these bees develop. Developmental research often uses time-staging of pupae, however dramatic size differences in these bees can generate variation in developmental timing. To study developmental mechanisms in bumble bees, appropriate staging of developing bees using morphology is necessary. In this study, we describe morphological changes across development in several bumble bee species and use this to establish morphology-based staging criteria, establishing 20 distinct illustrated stages. These criteria, defined largely by eye and cuticle pigmentation patterns, are generalizable across members of the subgenus Pyrobombus, and can be used as a framework for study of other bumble bee subgenera. We examine the effects of temperature, caste, size, and species on pupal development, revealing that pupal duration shifts with each of these factors, confirming the importance of staging pupae based on morphology rather than age and the need for standardizing sampling.

Highlights

  • The primitively eusocial bumble bees are important pollinators and fascinating models for studying developmental plasticity and adaptive variation

  • We examine the effects of sex, caste, temperature, and species on total pupal duration through observation of pupa reared under controlled environmental conditions outside the cocoon

  • These spicules are present throughout pupal development and are shed along with pupal cuticle during pupal-adult ecdysis without replacement in the adult

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The primitively eusocial bumble bees are important pollinators and fascinating models for studying developmental plasticity and adaptive variation. Bumble bees contain social castes that engage in division of labor among queens and workers. Social individuals in the nest can differ dramatically in body size, with queens being substantially and discretely larger than workers, and workers exhibiting dramatic plasticity in size, including up to 10-fold size variation (Couvillon et al, 2010). Deciphering genetic and developmental processes behind these phenotypes remains an active area of inquiry (Cnaani, Robinson & Hefetz, 2000; Couvillon & Dornhaus, 2009; Li et al, 2018; Pereboom et al, 2005; Tasei & Aupinel, 2008). New genetic technologies increasingly enable the targeting of genes and their functions in non-model organisms

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call