Abstract

Definition of monophyletic supraspecific units in the harpacticoid subfamily Stenheliinae Brady, 1880 has been considered problematic and hindered by the lack of molecular or morphology based phylogenies, as well as by incomplete original descriptions of many species. Presence of a modified seta on the fifth leg endopod has been suggested recently as a synapomorphy of eight species comprising the redefined genus Stenhelia Boeck, 1865, although its presence was not known in S. pubescens Chislenko, 1978. We redescribe this species in detail here, based on our freshly collected topotypes from the Russian Far East. The other species redescribed in this paper was collected from the southern coast of South Korea and identified as the Chinese S. taiae Mu & Huys, 2002, which represents its second record ever and the first one in Korea. A fragment of the mtCOI gene was successfully PCR-amplified from two specimens of each species, which represents the first molecular data for this genus, and from additional 19 specimens belonging to six different species of other stenheliins from Korea and Russia. Reconstructed phylogenies confirm previously postulated monophyly of Stenhelia and polyphyly of the closely related genus Delavalia Brady, 1869. Average pairwise maximum likelihood distances between S. pubescens and S. taiae are only slightly above 10%, suggesting a very close relationship despite numerous newly discovered micro-morphological differences and despite macro-morphological similarities being probable plesiomorphies.

Highlights

  • The subfamily Stenheliinae Brady, 1880 is currently recognised as one of three welldefined suprageneric groups within the second largest harpacticoid family Miraciidae Dana, 1846, beside the nominotypical subfamily and Diosaccinae Sars, 1906

  • Another moderately supported lineage is that uniting the three Wellstenhelia species (53%), but it was recovered in all analyses despite each species being represented with a single sequence (Table 2); divergences between morpho-species are much higher than in the genus Itostenhelia, which is in complete accordance with previously observed morphological evidence

  • The position of the genus Stenhelia deep inside this stenheliin group suggests that the two-segmented endopod of the first leg must have originated independently at least in Willenstenhelia and Itostenhelia /Wellstenhelia

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The subfamily Stenheliinae Brady, 1880 is currently recognised as one of three welldefined suprageneric groups within the second largest harpacticoid family Miraciidae Dana, 1846, beside the nominotypical subfamily and Diosaccinae Sars, 1906 (see Willen 2000; Boxshall and Halsey 2004; Wells 2007; Huys and Mu 2008). Ninety-three valid stenheliin species (Wells 2007; Walter and Boxshall 2014; Karanovic and Kim 2014) are currently classified into 12 genera: Anisostenhelia Mu & Huys, 2002 (monospecific); Beatricella T. 1905 (monospecific); Cladorostrata Tai & Song, 1979 (two species); Delavalia Brady, 1869 (53 species and subspecies); Itostenhelia Karanovic & Kim, 2014 (two species); Melima Por, 1964 (six species); Muohuysia Ozdikmen, 2009 (monospecific); Onychostenhelia Itô, 1979 (two species); Pseudostenhelia Wells, 1967 (four species); Stenhelia Boeck, 1865 (eight species); Wellstenhelia Karanovic & Kim 2014 (eight species), and Willenstenhelia Karanovic & Kim, 2014 (five species)

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call