Abstract

Evaluating the genetic and demographic independence of populations of threatened species is important for determining appropriate conservation measures, but different technologies can yield different conclusions. Despite multiple studies, the taxonomic status and extent of gene flow between the main breeding populations of Black-footed Albatross (Phoebastria nigripes), a Near-Threatened philopatric seabird, are still controversial. Here, we employ double digest RADseq to quantify the extent of genomewide divergence and gene flow in this species. Our genomewide data set of 9760 loci containing 3455 single nucleotide polymorphisms yielded estimates of genetic diversity and gene flow that were generally robust across seven different filtering and sampling protocols and suggest a low level of genomic variation (θ per site = ∼0.00002–0.00028), with estimates of effective population size (Ne = ∼500–15 881) falling far below current census size. Genetic differentiation was small but detectable between Japan and Hawaii (FST ≈ 0.038–0.049), with no FST outliers. Additionally, using museum specimens, we found that effect sizes of morphological differences by sex or population rarely exceeded 4%. These patterns suggest that the Hawaiian and Japanese populations exhibit small but significant differences and should be considered separate management units, although the evolutionary and adaptive consequences of this differentiation remain to be identified.

Highlights

  • Given limited resources for nature conservation, it is important to develop criteria for the prioritization of species protection efforts and a taxonomy that adequately reflects underlying genetic diversity

  • We conducted a genome-wide survey of genetic variation in Black-footed Albatrosses using restriction siteassociated DNA sequencing (RADseq), in an effort to assess the level of connectivity of colonies in Hawaii and Japan and to evaluate the implications for conservation

  • Our results provide further resolution and address some of the contradictions among previous studies based on mitochondrial DNA and microsatellites in this species

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Given limited resources for nature conservation, it is important to develop criteria for the prioritization of species protection efforts and a taxonomy that adequately reflects underlying genetic diversity. Definitions of the ESUs and MUs vary depending on the biological and legislative context, but in general, an ESU recognizes that the focal population has been isolated in the past and is likely to possess distinct evolutionary potential. MUs typically involves understanding the extent of allele frequency differences and the importance of demographic distinctness between units (Moritz 1994; Palsboll et al 2007). Both concepts evolve as new methods for quantifying neutral and adaptive genetic diversity and distinctness in the study of natural populations

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call