Abstract

AbstractIsolation due to habitat fragmentation can lead to morphological and functional variation between populations, with the effect being well documented in rodents. Here, we investigated whether such morphological variation could be identified between British populations of the Eurasian red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris). This species was once widespread across Great Britain, but suffered a severe population decline across the 20th century, leaving a highly fragmented distribution. The aim was to test for morphological and biomechanical variation of the mandible between the remaining British red squirrel populations, and between British and continental European red squirrels. Linear and geometric morphometric methods were used to analyse shape in a sample of over 250 red squirrel hemi‐mandibles from across Britain plus a sample from Germany representing the central European subspecies. Procrustes ANOVA identified significant shape variation between populations, with particularly distinct differences being noted between red squirrels from Germany and several British red squirrel populations, which may reflect their evolutionary history. Linear biomechanical measurements showed that the red squirrels from Formby and Jersey had a significantly lower mechanical advantage of the temporalis muscle than other British populations, suggesting they were less efficient at gnawing. This functional difference may be related to many factors, such as founder effect, potential inbreeding and/or past supplemental feeding with less mechanically resistant food items.

Highlights

  • It is well established that fragmentation of a population and the resulting isolation of the fragments can readily lead to morphological variation (e.g. Snorrason, et al, 1994; Losos, Warheit & Schoener, 1997; Grant, 1999; Sumner, Moritz & Shine, 1999; Renaud & Millien, 2001)

  • Such phenotypic change in isolated populations has been shown by many studies to be very rapid, with morphological variation following environmental change or introduction to a new habitat being detectable in just a few generations (Losos et al, 1997; Hale & Lurz, 2003; Kristjansson, 2005; Renaud et al, 2013)

  • Island populations are known to undergo especially fast morphological change (Lister, 1989; Millien, 2006, 2011; Evans et al, 2012), with the effect being well known in muroid rodents (e.g. Pergams & Ashley, 1999, 2001; Yom-Tov, Yom-Tov & Moller, 1999; Renaud et al, 2013, 2015; Pergams et al, 2015)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is well established that fragmentation of a population and the resulting isolation of the fragments can readily lead to morphological variation (e.g. Snorrason, et al, 1994; Losos, Warheit & Schoener, 1997; Grant, 1999; Sumner, Moritz & Shine, 1999; Renaud & Millien, 2001). Snorrason, et al, 1994; Losos, Warheit & Schoener, 1997; Grant, 1999; Sumner, Moritz & Shine, 1999; Renaud & Millien, 2001) Such phenotypic change in isolated populations has been shown by many studies to be very rapid, with morphological variation following environmental change or introduction to a new habitat being detectable in just a few generations (Losos et al, 1997; Hale & Lurz, 2003; Kristjansson, 2005; Renaud et al, 2013). Pergams & Lacy, 2008; Nagorsen & Cardini, 2009; Franssen, 2011; Yazdi & Adriaens, 2011; Doudna & Danielson, 2015; Renaud et al, 2015) Such morphological changes resulting from evolution on islands or in habitat fragments may have functional consequences. This has been noted between isolated populations of the same species in finches (Herrel et al, 2005), lizards (Herrel et al, 2008), and shrews (Cornette et al, 2012)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call