Morphologic and molecular analysis of early-onset gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas.

Abstract

4547 Background: The incidence of early-onset gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas (EO-GEA) is increasing, and these tumors now constitute > 30% of all gastroesophageal cancers. Besides hereditary gastric cancer syndromes, which form ~3% of EO-GEA, the morphologic and molecular spectrum of these tumors is not well-studied. Methods: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) data obtained from routine clinical care from patients with EO-GEA, defined as age ≤50 years, from 3 tertiary care centers was evaluated and compared with tumor profiles of 2,081 patients with GEA from cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics. Available histologic slides were reviewed, and the tumors were classified into Lauren and WHO subtypes. Tumor-detected pathogenic variants of potential germline origin were identified from the NGS data. Results: The study cohort was formed by 79 patients with gastroesophageal (42%) and gastric (58%) adenocarcinoma. The most commonly mutated genes included TP53 (28.5%), CDH1 (10%), ARID1A (5%), KRAS (3.9%) and PIK3CA (3.9%). EO-GEA were less likely to harbor TP53 (28.5% vs. 57.5%, p 0.003) and ARID1A (5% vs. 20.6%, p 0.002) mutations when compared with cBioPortal data. Based on the Lauren scheme, the tumors were classified into intestinal (40%), diffuse (24%), mixed (12%), and indeterminate (15%) subtypes. Driver mutations in CDH1, TP53, FBXW7, BAP1 genes were seen in diffuse/mixed subtype, and TP53, ARID1A, KRAS, PIK3CA, APC, ATM, NBN, MUTYH genes in intestinal subtype. The indeterminate subtype showed TP53 mutations and additional alterations, including SMARCB1/ SMARCA4 loss leading to rhabdoid/undifferentiated morphology. ERBB2 amplification was more likely to be present in intestinal and indeterminate subtypes (p = 0.003). CD274 amplification/PD-L1 expression was more likely to be present in indeterminate subtype (p < 0.0001). Potential germline variants included mutations in gastric cancer susceptibility genes such as CDH1 (2.5%) and APC (1%), and other cancer susceptibility genes such as ATM (4%), NBN (1%), MUTYH (1%) and POLD1 (1%). Conclusions: The molecular profile of EO-GEA is distinct from traditional gastric cancers. Histologic subtypes of EO-GEA correlate with distinct genomic alterations. Our findings also support multigene germline panel testing in parallel for patients with EO-GEA.