Abstract

This chapter offers a commentary on the correspondence exchanged between René Thom and Conrad Hal Waddington in 1967, concerning the interpretation in terms of catastrophe theory of the concepts of epigenetic landscape and chreod, introduced by Conrad Hal Waddington since the 1940s. It is intended to provide some elements of reflection on the difficulties encountered in exchanges between a mathematician and a biologist on the subject of the mathematization– in this case by means of a “dynamical systems” approach– of a theoretical question in biology, expressed in images by the compound metaphor of epigenetic landscape. One interpretation of the disagreement between the two scholars is based on the difference between their mathematical cultures, making it difficult to establish a shared dictionary (this was René Thom’s view). But another aspect must be taken into account to understand the difficulties of dialogue between the two scientists: the choice of variables (and the timescale specific to each of them) used to construct a mathematical model of the epigenetic landscape.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.