Abstract

Human behaviour follows a 24-h rhythm and is known to be governed by the individual chronotypes. Due to the widespread use of technology in our daily lives, it is possible to record the activities of individuals through their different digital traces. In the present study we utilise a large mobile phone communication dataset containing time stamps of calls and text messages to study the circadian rhythms of anonymous users in a European country. After removing the effect of the synchronization of East-West sun progression with the calling activity, we used two closely related approaches to heuristically compute the chronotypes of the individuals in the dataset, to identify them as morning persons or “larks” and evening persons or “owls”. Using the computed chronotypes we showed how the chronotype is largely dependent on age with younger cohorts being more likely to be owls than older cohorts. Moreover, our analysis showed how on average females have distinctly different chronotypes from males. Younger females are more larkish than males while older females are more owlish. Finally, we also studied the period of low calling activity for each of the users which is considered as a marker of their sleep period during the night. We found that while “extreme larks” tend to sleep more than “extreme owls” on the weekends, we do not observe much variation between them on weekdays. In addition, we have observed that women tend to sleep even less than males on weekdays while there is not much difference between them on the weekends.

Highlights

  • Human behaviour follows a 24-h rhythm and is known to be governed by the individual chronotypes

  • In order to determine individual’s daily periods of inactivity, we analyze separately the number of events that each individual made on different days of the week for over the 3-year period

  • As we are interested in determining the mid-sleep time, we determine the calling activity taking place on each night of the week, such that we split it in seven 24-h periods each one starting at 4:00 pm (e.g. 4:00 pm Monday, and ending at 3:59 pm on the day which is Tuesday)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Human behaviour follows a 24-h rhythm and is known to be governed by the individual chronotypes. Studies concerning identification of chronotypes have been done using the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire (MCTQ)[14,15,16] This questionnaire, the first of its kind, consists of a set of unique questions relating to an individual’s sleep-wake cycle along with iconic supporting drawings that help clarify differences between the time an individual decides to go to sleep and the actual time of falling asleep. Gender differences of ­chronotypes[19] have been studied using MEQ in which they concluded the existence of different synchronization patterns for men and women While these surveys are excellent tools to understand human behaviour, they are generally restricted in terms of sample sizes, memory of the participants, and what is socially and societally expected

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call