Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the role played by vigilance on the anaerobic performance recorded during a Wingate test performed at the bathyphase (nadir) of the circadian rhythmicity. Twenty active male participants performed a 60-s Wingate test at 6 a.m. during 3 test sessions in counter-balanced order the day after either (i) a normal reference night, (ii) a total sleep deprivation night, or (iii) a total sleep deprivation night associated with an extended simulated driving task from 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. During this task, the number of inappropriate line crossings (ILCs) was used to control and quantify the effective decrease in the level of vigilance. The main findings show that (i) vigilance of each participant was significantly altered (i.e., a drastic and progressive increase in ILCs is shown during the 7.5 hours of driving) by the sleep deprivation night associated with an extended driving task; (ii) the subjective evaluation of vigilance performed by self-rated scale revealed an increased impairment of the vigilance level between the normal reference night, the total sleep deprivation night and the total sleep deprivation night associated with an extended driving task; and (iii) the morning following this last condition, during the Wingate test, the recorded cycling biomechanical parameters (peak power, mean power and fatigue index values, power decrease, and cycling kinetic and kinematic patterns) were not significantly different from the two other conditions. Consequently, these results show that anaerobic performances recorded during a Wingate test performed at the bathyphase of the circadian rhythmicity are not altered by a drastic impairment in vigilance. These findings seem to indicate that vigilance is probably not a factor that contributes to circadian variations in anaerobic performance.

Highlights

  • Anaerobic performances obtained during a Wingate test fluctuate as a function of the time of day [1,2,3,4,5,6]

  • Most of these factors are clearly affected by the time of day [2,5,6,13,14,15]. They fluctuate in phase with the power output values (PP and mean power (MP)) recorded during the Wingate test throughout the day and this could explain the diurnal variations in anaerobic performances [1,2,3,4,5,6]

  • If a causal link exists between the diurnal variations in vigilance and those of anaerobic performance, it can be hypothesized that impairment in vigilance would decrease the performance observed during sustained anaerobic cycling exercise at 6 a.m

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Anaerobic performances obtained during a Wingate test fluctuate as a function of the time of day [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The use of a special fixed-based driving simulator, as that used in the Davenne et al [20] study, appears to be suitable to objectively quantify and control the vigilance level during the night of total sleep deprivation In this context, if a causal link exists between the diurnal variations in vigilance and those of anaerobic performance, it can be hypothesized that impairment in vigilance would decrease the performance observed during sustained anaerobic cycling exercise at 6 a.m. The aim of this study was to determine the role played by vigilance on the anaerobic performance recorded during a Wingate test performed at the bathyphase (nadir) of the circadian rhythmicity

Materials and Methods
Results
Objective
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call