Abstract

Since the publication of my study,1 on May 22, 2020, showing longer incubation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in older adults, there have been three further published studies2-4 that confirm my finding. These studies used epidemiological data from December 2019 to March 2020 that were sourced from China, countries outside China, the Diamond Princess cruise ship, and Singapore, with age cut-offs of 42, 60, and 70 years to define their younger and older age groups (Figure 1). Taking all four studies together, the median COVID-19 incubation period (Figure 1) was 4-7 days for younger adults (median age, 26-49 years) and 7-11 days for older adults (median age, 55-73 years).1-4 However, differing results were obtained concerning any age-related differences at ≥90th percentiles (right-hand tails of the incubation distributions). While Pak et al4 found a longer incubation period at ≥90th percentiles for older adults, as in my study,1 Dai et al2 and Tan et al3 did not find such a difference (Figure 1). My study and that of Pak et al4 both showed that the current 14-day quarantine period was inadequate for older adults: 28% and 17.1% fell outside this period, respectively, while a longer 17-day quarantine period for older adults would reduce the non-coverage to 10%.1, 4 On the contrary, Dai et al2 and Tan et al2 opined from their findings that a 14-day quarantine period would be adequate for both young and old.2, 3 Based on initial estimates of the incubation period, the World Health Organization has adopted 14 days in the case definition for COVID-19, and this 14-day period is used in diagnosis, contact tracing, and quarantine. My study and that of Pak et al,2 however, suggest that this 14-day case definition may have to be revised upward for older adults.1, 4 Rowan H. Harwood,5 editor-in-chief of Age and Ageing, has advocated the adoption of a precautionary approach to protect care homes by quarantining new or returning residents for longer periods due to uncertainty over dates of onset and lengths of infectivity, and the continuing occurrence of widespread outbreaks, mortality, and threats to the well-being of care home residents. Of the four studies reviewed here, three1-3 used age cut-offs of 60, 65, and 70 years to define older adults; but the lower cut-off of 42 years in Pak et al's study4 meant that middle-aged adults were included in their older age group. Despite the vulnerability to and adverse outcomes of COVID-19 in older adults, the number of older adults aged ≥65 years recruited into incubation studies has been relatively small, ranging from 21 to 37 in the four studies reviewed here,1-4 and information on their frailty statuses was lacking. The latter is especially important in view of the pattern that care homes for elders have frequently been sites for COVID-19 outbreaks and deaths. Further studies involving larger numbers of older adults, preferably with frailty factored in (ie, biological age studied instead of chronological age), would help to clarify the right-hand tail of the COVID-19 incubation distribution and inform clinical practice and public-health policy. Nothing to disclose.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.