Abstract

It is shown that nonreflexive Banach spaces with a separable dual and the boundedly complete skipped blocking property have quasi-reflexive subspaces. In particular, Bourgain's somewhat reflexive ?,c-spaces and Polish Banach spaces are somewhat quasi-reflexive. The author in [1] has shown that most collections of Banach spaces which are known to contain a reflexive subspace also contain a quasi-reflexive subspace. (Of course, the words are needed to make this correct. Banach spaces are assumed to be infinite dimensional unless otherwise stated.) Indeed, the following question is still open: (1) Does each nonreflexive Banach space contain co, 11 or a quasi-reflexive subspace? An affirmative answer to (1) w6uld imply an affirmative answer to the well-known question: (2) Does each Banach space contain c0, 11 or a reflexive subspace? In [3] (or see [2]), Bourgain and Delbaen construct a collection of somewhat reflexive C,,-spaces. It was suggested to the author that these spaces might yield a negative answer to question (1). This note shows that these ZOO-spaces contain quasi-reflexive spaces, and hence (1) is still open. In [4] (or see [7]), Edgar and Wheeler show that each Polish Banach space contains a reflexive subspace. (A Banach space is Polish if its unit ball with the weak topology is a Polish topological space, i.e. homeomorphic to a separable complete metric space). Our Theorem 3 implies that each nonreflexive Polish space has quasireflexive subspaces. Indeed, X being Polish is equivalent to X* being separable and X has PCP [4] (or see [7]); while X has PCP is equivalent to X having the boundedly complete skipped blocking property [5] (or see [7]). We mention a short footnote to [1]. In [1] it was shown that most positive answers to question (2) also have a positive answer to question (1). The only exception noted in [1] was the space X* when X**/X is separable. However, Valdivia [8] had already shown that X = R Ef Y where Y** is separable and R is reflexive. Hence X* = R* E3 Y* and X* has quasi-reflexive subspaces by Theorem 9 of [1]. Our notation is standard and follows that of [6]. Also this paper is a sequel to [1], where some details are more carefully explained. Received by the editors April 1, 1986 and, in revised form, September 2, 1986. 1980 Mathematics Subject Classification (1985 Revision). Primary 46B10, 46B20.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call