Abstract
In 2004, Bertrand and Mullainathan published an innovative piece of research that involved sending nearly 5,000 fictitious resumes to employers. Their paper is commonly cited for finding that applicants with White-sounding names benefitted more from experience on their resumes and received 50 percent more invitations to interview than other applicants. The current research, however, demonstrates that while Bertrand and Mullainathan made a critically important contribution to the literature on employment discrimination, there is still much more that we can learn from their data. Through a reanalysis of Bertrand and Mullainathan's data, we find that discriminatory effects were stronger in conditions in which a job posting's experience requirements were ambiguous, applicants with first names of Arabic origin experienced higher levels of discrimination than applicants with other non-White-sounding names, and that the discriminatory effects of having an African-American-sounding name could not be empirically differentiated from the discriminatory effects associated with a name's frequency within the overall population. Our findings contribute to the literature on human information processing and offer important practical contributions regarding how employers can potentially reduce discrimination in selection processes. Additionally, we offer important suggestions for the development of racial manipulations in future experimental research.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.