Abstract
Recent research revealed that despite its financial costs, overcompensation is not more effective to restore trust in the perpetrator than equal compensation. In a lab experiment (N = 115), we compared the effects of these compensation sizes for both targets of the compensation and non-involved observers. It was revealed that overcompensation did not yield superior outcomes than equal compensation. Specifically, for targets overcompensation resulted in lower levels of trust than equal compensation, while for observers equal compensation and overcompensation resulted in similar levels of trust. This finding suggests that overcompensation is not a cost-effective trust repair strategy, neither for the targets nor for third party observers. Other implications are discussed as well.
Highlights
Trust plays a pivotal role in many aspects of our lives, as it represents a necessary ingredient to coordinate and smooth social relationships (Cook, 2001)
We investigated whether target-observer differences exist in the effectiveness of financialcompensation as a trust repair strategy
We supplement the current literature by showing that for non-involved observing parties, overcompensation is neither more effective than equal compensation to re-establish broken trust (Hypothesis 2b)
Summary
Target and Observer Differences in the Effectiveness of Financial Overcompensation to Restore Trust. Recent research revealed that despite its financial costs, overcompensation is not more effective to restore trust in the perpetrator than equal compensation. It was revealed that overcompensation did not yield superior outcomes than equal compensation. For targets overcompensation resulted in lower levels of trust than equal compensation, while for observers equal compensation and overcompensation resulted in similar levels of trust. This finding suggests that overcompensation is not a cost-effective trust repair strategy, neither for the targets nor for third party observers.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.