Abstract
The 40 participants of the workshop were divided into four, multi-disciplinary working groups. A deliberate effort was made by the workshop organizers to ensure a range of background disciplines and experience in each group. Each group began with a list of 26 `gaps in knowledge' and 28 `impact opportunities' which they attempted to prioritize and adapt to formulate research themes. The four groups came to surprisingly different conclusions. An attempt is made here to draw some conclusions from the group deliberations that might guide the selection of research topics to be commissioned in the near future under the high potential production system of the Natural Resources Systems Programme (NRSP).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
