Abstract
AbstractThis chapter discusses the Four-Seven Debate and the Horak Debate, the two major philosophical debates of Korean Neo-Confucianism and analyzes how Korean Neo-Confucians in the Joseon dynasty understood and explained emotions in their theories of the mind, morality, and human nature. Although the Korean thinkers respected and followed the philosophical framework of the Cheng-Zhu Neo-Confucianism, they also developed their own theories of emotions. The philosophical significance of Korean Neo-Confucianism lies in its unique moral psychology, the moral psychology of the emotional mind with its dedication to the moral nature of human beings and the regulative principle of the universe.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
