Abstract
Before the 1860s many leading American psychiatrists accepted the concept of moral insanity as defined by Prichard. These men also emphasized the psychological element in the etiology, pathology, and treatment of mental illness and were in advance of their colleagues on most psychiatric questions. They tried to take a purely clinical and scientific view of mental illness and to broaden its confines to include largely emotional disorders. Some psychiatrists, however, had reservations about the theory of moral insanity, and a few, like Gray, condemned it outright. Fear of public opinion, reluctance to take an independent stand on controversial issues, and attachment to conventional moral precepts, combined with an increasing stress on somaticism, led a growing number of American psychiatrists eventually to reject the concept of moral insanity. This trend reflected the passing of the first and more venturesome generation of the new profession. The problems that moral insanity dealt with and the controversy that it inspired, however, remain with us to this day.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
