Abstract
This study examines corporate bond guarantees by developing a theoretical model that decomposes the overall impact of a guarantee into signalling and incentive effects and presenting empirical evidence based on data from China’s corporate bond market. Our empirical research yields considerable evidence for the effects we posit in the model and provides some important insights into the problems of adverse selection and moral hazard in China’s bond market. The empirical evidence shows that the bond issuer with lower credit rating are more willing to purchase a bond guarantee and guaranteed bonds have a higher issue spread yield than those non-guaranteed bonds, even though both have the same bond credit rating. Our findings suggest that moral hazard would be better than adverse selection to explain the self- selection of bond guarantees. Prior to bond issuance credit rating signal provides a mechanism to mitigate information inequality, while bond guarantees relieve information asymmetry afterwards.
Highlights
This paper examines the signalling and incentive effects of a bond guarantee mechanism mitigating problems of adverse selection and moral hazard in China’s corporate bond market
Adverse selection is concerned with information asymmetry before the debt is issued; that is, a bond guarantee is considered as a signal sent by the debtor with an information advantage to the creditor, and the debtor with low risk can obtain a lower interest rate with the use of a guarantee
Based on a sample of China’s bond market for the period of 2008 to 2015, our study shows that the corporate bond issuers with lower credit ratings are more willing to purchase a bond guarantee and guaranteed bonds have the higher issue spread yields than those non-guaranteed bonds with the same credit rating
Summary
This paper examines the signalling and incentive effects of a bond guarantee mechanism mitigating problems of adverse selection and moral hazard in China’s corporate bond market. Like collaterals in debt contracts, economic theory treats a guarantee as for the compensation of ex-ante information asymmetry or the method to reduce the ex-post agency problem (Berger et al, 2011), resulting in the formation of two opposite effects: adverse selection and moral hazard. Adverse selection is concerned with information asymmetry before the debt is issued; that is, a bond guarantee is considered as a signal sent by the debtor with an information advantage to the creditor, and the debtor with low risk can obtain a lower interest rate with the use of a guarantee
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.