Abstract
This article aims to investigate the integrity taking into account the relationship between culture and psychology. The conceptual framework is very sophisticated because of the wide range of studies from philosophy, education, psychology, communication, linguistic and semiotics, neurosciences, law, and so on. The multiplicity of efforts to design meta-ethics and the international needs to assume some principles and guidelines reveal the importance of the approach. The text from the Bible about Martha and Mary – a moral dilemma – becomes the start point of the investigation. The text could be considered a story, a case-study in terms of meta-ethics, a problem-solving or a hypothesis to examine moral brain. The qualitative analysis of the findings offer –despite the difficulty of moral reasoning – academically substantial inferences regarding legal decisions. For example, each judicial case could use in ethical reasoning, the similar routes of moral reasoning. The target population (660 students) was invited to critically assess the position of Martha and the position of Mary, then to explain their moral judgment behind the answer. The application stimulates moral thinking and critical thinking. To conclude, moral cognition is related to moral communication. There are various advantages for empirical work taking into account the transferability and the generalizability of findings. It is important that the formula of moral communication pretext can be adapted to suit a wide variety of research situations and various purposes.
Highlights
In the contemporary crisis the culture of dishonesty growing up, the social recognition of the honesty is deteriorated and the implications for the ethical behavior in day by day life are problematic [1]
From the vantage point of analytic coding, the data collected from the longitudinal research is due to following analysis categories: 1. moral thinking is related to moral conscience; 2. moral thinking is a result of routinized connections from the brain; 3. moral decision making is a result of comparative analysis; 4. subjective moral reasoning is generated by conflict and plurality values; 5. cognitive styles are related to moral brain; 6. it is a multi-dimensional account of moral thinking
In regard to the differences between qualitative answers compared to statistical metrics from the fieldwork, these are not significant. Another notable result was the clear pattern of moral dimension; the wording is very consistent concerning high honesty: “-When I have to choose between Martha and Mary, often I tend to give reason to Martha
Summary
In the contemporary crisis the culture of dishonesty growing up, the social recognition of the honesty is deteriorated and the implications for the ethical behavior in day by day life are problematic [1]. There are various types of knowledge on moral dimension of life from the vantage point of different perspectives: theoretical, experimental, cultural, hypothesized in terms of moral intelligence, spiritual intelligence, existential intelligence, moral law, moral brain, critical thinking and moral reasoning, moral development, observational learning, moral rights, moral communication, social justice, moral values, neuro-ethics, emotive ethics, bioethics, moral conscience, dilemmas, and so on. This means that there are multiple debates about performance management, ethical behavior, metrics of company culture The psychological investigations, religious approaches, genomic and metagenomic perspectives, ethnographic researches, potential reflective interplay, all produce multidisciplinary approaches
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
