Abstract
Past research suggests that some moral principles encourage prosocial behavior by binding people together into tight-knit groups. In the present research, we test (1) how – at the psychological process level – morality binds groups together, (2) which moral principles have a binding effect, and (3) what kinds of collective experiences promote moral binding. Across five studies (N = 1623) and different conceptual frameworks, we find consistent empirical evidence for moral binding. First, our data suggest that identity fusion mediates the relationship between group members’ moral convictions and their willingness to engage in extreme progroup behavior. Second, our analyses revealed a binding effect of moral principles involving hierarchy/deference and generosity/benevolence through this mechanism. Finally, we find that negative collective experiences and positive group-based emotions predicted the emergence of moral binding in the context of both the family and national group memberships.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.