Abstract

The term “moral absolute” refers to many different ideas. In contemporary moral philosophy, it most commonly refers to the idea of a moral prohibition or rule that admits of no exception. Less commonly, it refers to the idea of a moral principle or standard that applies to all moral agents, rather than only to members of a particular society or culture or only to particular individuals (e.g., those who accept it). The present topic is moral absolutes in the first of these two senses. Notable philosophers who have maintained that there are such absolutes include Immanuel Kant and Elizabeth Anscombe. And the debate over the existence of moral absolutes has implications not only for general moral theory, but also for many topics in applied ethics. For example, the question of whether the moral prohibition against intentionally (or deliberately) killing the innocent is absolute has important implications for abortion, euthanasia, and noncombatant immunity. And there are ongoing debates about whether the moral prohibitions against terrorism and torture are absolute.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call