Abstract
Mood is a lasting affective state that influences motivation and decision-making by pre-shaping a subject’s expectations (pessimism/optimism). Mood states affect biases in judgment, memory, and attention. Due to a lack of verbal report, assessing mood in non-human animals is challenging and is often compromised by intense training sessions. Measuring mood using attentional biases can circumvent this problem, as it takes advantage of observing a spontaneous reaction. As in humans, we expected that negative mood will heighten attention toward negative compared to positive stimuli. Here, we validate measures of attention toward acoustic stimuli in sheep (N = 64) and assess sheep’s differential attention toward acoustic stimuli before and after mood induction (N = 32). Mood was induced by manipulating the environment. We used animal vocalizations (dog barking and sheep bleating as negative and positive stimuli, respectively) varying in intensity and played simultaneously from one side each, and measured lateral attention based on the sheep’s behavior. Overall results were somewhat ambiguous. Yet, negative mood sheep seemed to shift their attention more toward dog vocalizations when the stimulus pair was well balanced at baseline. Though some adaptations are still needed, our approach could be a promising alternative to measure animals’ mood without prior training.
Highlights
Mood is a lasting affective state that influences motivation, learning and decision-making
During trials with animal vocalizations, sheep showed a higher relative overall attention toward high intensity dog vocalizations
Though the results were ambiguous to some extent, it seems that sheep in a more negative mood shifted their strong attention toward dog vocalizations when the stimulus pair was well balanced at baseline
Summary
Mood is a lasting affective state that influences motivation, learning and decision-making. The cognitive judgement bias test has been introduced as the standard approach to assess mood in animals[4,5,11] This test consists of training subjects to associate two cues on the same physical axis with a negative and a positive outcome. It can be assessed whether the subjects judged the ambiguous cue as being more similar to the negative or the positive cue and being associated with the negative or positive outcome (pessimistic or optimistic reaction, respectively) As this approach relies on learnt responses to relatively arbitrary and novel stimuli, the meaning of the animals’ reaction toward ambiguous stimuli is not strongly influenced by previous experiences with these stimuli. Animals might differ in their previous experience with the stimuli used and, a given stimulus may vary in its emotional content among different individuals
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.