Abstract

The commons approach to knowledge governance is an increasingly popular and successful model for mediating and explaining the ways in which knowledge producers and users, institutions, and shared information resources, interact in social and cultural domains. There is a growing body of literature on the knowledge commons, to which this article seeks to contribute by offering an analysis of massive open online courses (MOOCs). The study outlined in this article deployed the knowledge commons research framework developed by Madison, Frischmann and Strandburg (2010). This framework attempts to align studies of knowledge commons by providing a structured yet flexible set of research questions that emphasise the dynamic relation between default governance regimes (such as proprietary intellectual property rights), tools and infrastructure, and social and cultural norms. The study determined that the MOOC environment exhibits some characteristics of a knowledge commons, and thus the Madison et al. (2010) framework can be productively applied in this context. In addition, the study found that, due to the generally conventional copyright paradigms and varying degrees of openness within the proprietary MOOC platforms, MOOCs can be considered a type of what Madison et al. (2010) term a “semicommons”. Furthermore, because access to learning resources, a key element of access to knowledge (A2K), is an important driver of development, and because openness is an important facilitator of that access, the semicommons status of MOOCs (as learning resources) to some extent mitigates their contribution to increased A2K.

Highlights

  • In the context of increasing levels of openness in society and access to information precipitated by the rise of the World Wide Web (Weller, 2014), models are needed to explain the ways in which knowledge producers and users, shared information resources, and institutions, interact in social and cultural domains (Madison, et al, 2010)

  • The study outlined in this article examined the massive open online courses (MOOCs) phenomenon through the lens of the knowledge commons research framework offered by Madison, Frischmann and Strandburg (2010)

  • Commons-oriented approaches to knowledge governance offer insights into normative cultural methods of knowledge production and dissemination, which function alongside the formal institutional paradigms of intellectual property (IP).The knowledge commons research framework presents a method for analysing knowledge commons so as to better understand the features that define them

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the context of increasing levels of openness in society and access to information precipitated by the rise of the World Wide Web (Weller, 2014), models are needed to explain the ways in which knowledge producers and users, shared information resources, and institutions, interact in social and cultural domains (Madison, et al, 2010). In order to populate the knowledge commons research framework and address representative research questions provided by the framework authors, the study used existing research and literature on the history and development of MOOCs. In the analysis, the study gave particular consideration to the functions of intellectual property (IP) – copyright, as the default knowledge governance regime governing many educational resources – in what Benkler has termed the “increasingly permeable boundaries between the university and the world” in “the networked information economy” The study was able to reach the conclusion that the generally proprietary copyright environment around MOOCs means that, when scrutinised via the knowledge commons research framework, MOOCs appear to represent a type of what Madison et al (2010) call “semicommons”

Understanding the commons
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call