Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential skin dose toxicity contribution of spiralling contaminant electrons (SCE) generated in the air in an MR‐linac with a 0.35 or 1.5 T magnetic field using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo (MC) code. Comparisons to experimental results at 1.5 T are also performed.MethodsAn Elekta generated phase space file for the Unity MR‐linac is used in conjunction with the EGSnrc enhanced electric and magnetic field transport macros to simulate surface dose profiles and depth‐dose curves in panels located 5 cm away from the beam edge and positioned either parallel or perpendicular to the magnetic field. Electrons generated in the air will spiral along the magnetic field lines, and though surface doses within the field will be reduced, the electrons can contribute to out‐of‐field surface doses.ResultsSurface dose profiles showed good agreement with experimental findings and the maximum simulated doses at surfaces perpendicular to the magnetic field were 3.77 ± 0.01% and 3.55 ± 0.01% for 1.5 and 0.35 T. These results are expressed as a percentage of the maximum dose to water delivered by the photon beam. The surface dose variations in the out‐of‐field region converge to the 0 T doses within the first 0.5 cm of material. An asymmetry in the dose distribution in surfaces positioned on either side of the photon beam and aligned parallel to the magnetic field is determined to be due to the magnetic field directing electrons deeper into, or localizing them to the surface of, the measurement panel.ConclusionsThese results confirm the SCE dose contribution in surfaces perpendicular to the magnetic field and show these doses to be of the order of a few percentage of the maximum dose to water of the beam. Good agreement in the dose profiles is seen in comparisons between the MC simulations and experimental work. The effect is apparent in 0.35 and 1.5 T magnetic fields and dissipates within the first few millimeters of material. It should be noted that only SCEs from beam anteriorly incident on the patient will influence the patient surface dose, and the use of beams incident over different angles will reduce the dose to any particular patient surface.
Highlights
In regions of sharp density changes and is responsible for an increase in the interface surface dose
A perpendicular magnetic field sweeps contaminant electrons out of the primary field and induces a reduction in doses to surfaces along the direction of the photon field
When a higher ECUT of 661 keV is used for the simulations, there is no statistically significant difference between the surface doses of the y panels, which would indicate that the contribution is coming from low-energy electrons
Summary
In regions of sharp density changes and is responsible for an increase in the interface surface dose. The Viewray MRIdian[6] (Co-60 or linac) and the Elektra MR-linac[7,8] employ a gantry dose due to magnetic containment of scatter electrons from the linac head and irradiated air.[4,14,15,16] a perpendicular magnetic field sweeps contaminant electrons out of the primary field and induces a reduction in doses to surfaces along the direction of the photon field ( this reduction may system in which the incoming radiation beam is always per- be obscured by the ERE). In addition to 1.5 T, the SCE effect is explored in 0.35 T and compared to 0 T out-of-field doses
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
