Abstract

Sub-100 nm lithography has been realized recently in the IC industry. The resolution enhancement techniques (RET) and optical proximity effect correction (OPC) require more complicated mask patterns. It is therefore, very important to simulate and calculate mask error enhanced factor (MEEF), and critical dimension (CD) variations on the mask and wafer correctly using optical simulation tool before manufacturing. However, the expectations of MEEF and CD error using the in-house optical simulation tool, Topo, are larger than those of the experimental result. These are caused by many reasons. The ignorance of the vector property of light could be one reason. In case of using higher numerical aperture (NA), the vector property of light, such as polarization, should be taken into account when calculation of printed image on wafer. Also, the ignorance of the local CD error caused by the neighborhood could be another reason. The second issue described above has been studied using the Monte Carlo (MC) method, a commonly used statistical method. We assume that all of the factors follow the normal curve with a certain standard deviation. This assumption is sufficient for studying local CD error by the MC method. When the local CD variation on the mask for the design rule 110 nm is 3 nm in its 3σ, CD variation of approximately 2.0 nm on wafer is expected by the MC method. This result is fairly comparable with experimental one, when the MEEF is about 2.7 locally. We obtain another MEEF value, around 4.1 globally, when the mask CD deviates from the target CD by ±12 nm in 3σ. This study shows that the MC method gives a result close to that of the experimental one greater than 2.5 of MEEF locally.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call