Abstract
The study of generalized quatifiers, quantifiers other than “for all” and “there exist” has been taken up in the recent years by two branches of logic: model theory and recursion theory. It would seem that the admissible set theory would be one area where the two approaches could work together and it is the topic taken up here. In model theory, it has been traditional to study quatifiers based on cardinality considerations. It was in recursion theory, that the importance of just plain monotonicity emerged, and we are concerned with these quantifiers. Everything was inspired by the results from the folklore of the model theory of generalized quantifiers. One can think of most of the precise mathematical quantifiers as attempts to make one of these quatifiers precise. It is interesting to speculate whether any of these are precise enough to already list some of the commonly accepted axioms about them.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.