Abstract

The mono-photon signature emerging in an ${\mathrm{E}}_{6}$ supersymmetric standard model (${\mathrm{E}}_{6}\mathrm{SSM}$) from inert Higgsino dark matter (DM) is analyzed at future ${e}^{+}{e}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ colliders. As the inert neutral and charged Higgsinos are nearly degenerate, the inert chargino is a rather long lived particle and the charged particle associated with its decay to the inert Higgsino is quite soft. We show that the pair production of inert charginos at a 500 GeV electron-positron collider with an initial or final state photon is the most promising channel for probing the inert Higgsino as one DM candidate within the ${\mathrm{E}}_{6}\mathrm{SSM}$. We also emphasize that this signal has no chance of being observed at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) with higher energy and/or luminosity. Finally, we remark that, combined with a DM signal produced in direct detection (DD) experiments involving an active Higgsino state as the second DM candidate, this dual evidence could point to a two-component DM version of the ${\mathrm{E}}_{6}\mathrm{SSM}$.

Highlights

  • The mono-photon signature emerging in an E6 supersymmetric standard model (E6SSM) from inert Higgsino dark matter (DM) is analyzed at future eþe− colliders

  • We show that the pair production of inert charginos at a 500 GeV electron-positron collider with an initial or final state photon is the most promising channel for probing the inert Higgsino as one DM candidate within the E6SSM

  • We remark that, combined with a DM signal produced in direct detection (DD) experiments involving an active Higgsino state as the second DM candidate, this dual evidence could point to a twocomponent DM version of the E6SSM

Read more

Summary

Shaaban Khalil*

The mono-photon signature emerging in an E6 supersymmetric standard model (E6SSM) from inert Higgsino dark matter (DM) is analyzed at future eþe− colliders. [12], we focused on a two-component DM version of the E6SSM based on an active and inert Higgsino as candidates We emphasized that they can share (at a comparable level) the contributions to the DM relic abundance and illustrated that it is not possible to detect the inert candidate in DD experiments searching for DM, whereas the active one is accessible therein. Hu3, Hd3 and S3 get vacuum expectation values (VEVs) while the other two families do not develop any and have no (or very suppressed) couplings with the SM fermions, so they remain (essentially) inert.

Published by the American Physical Society
TeV and full integrated luminosity for
Higgsino signal the photon energy is constrained by pffiffi
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call