Abstract

With the continuous advancements in microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) fabrication technology, inertial sensors like accelerometers and gyroscopes can be designed and manufactured with smaller footprint and lower power consumption. In the literature, there are several reported accelerometer designs based on MEMS technology and utilizing various transductions like capacitive, piezoelectric, optical, thermal, among several others. In particular, capacitive accelerometers are the most popular and highly researched due to several advantages like high sensitivity, low noise, low temperature sensitivity, linearity, and small footprint. Accelerometers can be designed to sense acceleration in all the three directions (X, Y, and Z-axis). Single-axis accelerometers are the most common and are often integrated orthogonally and combined as multiple-degree-of-freedom (MDoF) packages for sensing acceleration in the three directions. This type of MDoF increases the overall device footprint and cost. It also causes calibration errors and may require expensive compensations. Another type of MDoF accelerometers is based on monolithic integration and is proving to be effective in solving the footprint and calibration problems. There are mainly two classes of such monolithic MDoF accelerometers, depending on the number of proof masses used. The first class uses multiple proof masses with the main advantage being zero calibration issues. The second class uses a single proof mass, which results in compact device with a reduced noise floor. The latter class, however, suffers from high cross-axis sensitivity. It also requires very innovative layout designs, owing to the complicated mechanical structures and electrical contact placement. The performance complications due to nonlinearity, post fabrication process, and readout electronics affects both classes of accelerometers. In order to effectively compare them, we have used metrics such as sensitivity per unit area and noise-area product. This paper is devoted to an in-depth review of monolithic multi-axis capacitive MEMS accelerometers, including a detailed analysis of recent advancements aimed at solving their problems such as size, noise floor, cross-axis sensitivity, and process aware modeling.

Highlights

  • An accelerometer is a mechanical sensor which measures various modes of accelerations whether they are constant, time varying, or quasi static

  • The results indicate a sensitivity of 0.24 fF/g for√in-plane motion and 0.82 fF/g for out-of the plane motion with the maximum noise floor being 0.76 mg/ Hz

  • We have given an overview of monolithic, multi-axis accelerometers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

An accelerometer is a mechanical sensor which measures various modes of accelerations whether they are constant (gravity), time varying (vibrations), or quasi static (tilt). Monolithic three-axis accelerometers that are composed of multiple proof masses have been reported since 1990s [8] These devices have very low cross-axis sensitivity but suffer from high Brownian noise and have relatively large form factor [8]. It has been found that with the use of a single proof mass for three-axis sensing, a 50% reduction in the chip size can be achieved [9,10]. Even though their Brownian noise is low, the single proof-mass accelerometers suffer from very high cross-axis sensitivity. The main objective of the present paper is to survey the reported monolithic multi-axis accelerometers and analyze in detail their structures and key MEMS design decisions that have enabled them to overcome the reported sensing challenges

Applications of Multi-Axis Accelerometers
Accelerometer Operating Principle
Specifications of Accelerometers
Brownian Noise
Sensitivity
Cross-Axis Sensitivity
Dynamic Range and Nonlinearity
Frequency Response and the Bandwidth
Types of Accelerometers
Single-Proof-Mass 3-Axial Accelerometers
Comparison of Single-Proof-Mass and Multiple-Proof-Mass Accelerometers
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.