Abstract

Planting non-native tree species, like Douglas fir in temperate European forest systems, is encouraged to mitigate effects of climate change. However, Douglas fir monocultures often revealed negative effects on forest biota, while effects of mixtures with native tree species on forest ecosystems are less well understood. We investigated effects of three tree species (Douglas fir, Norway spruce, native European beech), on ground beetles in temperate forests of Germany. Beetles were sampled in monocultures of each tree species and broadleaf-conifer mixtures with pitfall traps, and environmental variables were assessed around each trap. We used linear mixed models in a two-step procedure to disentangle effects of environment and tree species identity on ground beetle abundance, species richness, functional diversity and species assemblage structure. Contradictory to our expectations, ground beetle abundance and functional diversity was highest in pure Douglas fir stands, while tree mixtures showed intermediate values between pure coniferous and pure beech stands. The main drivers of these patterns were only partially dependent on tree species identity, which highlights the importance of structural features in forest stands. However, our study revealed distinct shifts in assemblage structure between pure beech and pure Douglas fir stands, which were only partially eased through mixture planting. Our findings suggest that effects of planting non-native trees on associated biodiversity can be actively modified by promoting beneficial forest structures. Nevertheless, integrating non-native tree species, even in mixtures with native trees, will invariably alter assemblage structures of associated biota, which can compromise conservation efforts targeted at typical species composition.

Highlights

  • Human impact is increasingly altering ecosystems worldwide, with wide-ranging consequences for biodiversity and ecosystem services (Cardinale et al 2012; Dirzo et al 2014)

  • For the analyses of ground beetles, we focused on rarefied species richness, abundance and, as a commonly used measure of functional diversity, Raos quadratic entropy (Raos Q; Rao, 1982)

  • Litter depth was significantly higher in pure beech and mixed stands than in pure coniferous stands, with the only exception of pure spruce compared to beech / Douglas fir mixture where no significant difference could be observed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Human impact is increasingly altering ecosystems worldwide, with wide-ranging consequences for biodiversity and ecosystem services (Cardinale et al 2012; Dirzo et al 2014). Despite positive trends towards more nature-friendly management, threats to biodiversity may persist in the future Reasons for this include the promotion of potentially climatically better adapted, non-native tree species due to climate change (Bindewald et al 2019). Such non-native tree species are often characterized by an impoverished associated biodiversity (Kennedy and Southwood 1984) and their increasing use in many regions has spurred a wealth of studies investigating their impact on native biodiversity (e.g. Finch and Szumelda 2007; Irwin et al 2014; Schuldt and Scherer-Lorenzen 2014; Oxbrough et al 2016; Matevski and Schuldt 2020). Few studies to date have looked at the functional diversity of associated biota in this context (e.g. Gallé et al 2018; Martello et al 2018), this component of biodiversity is key to understanding how the ecological roles of assemblages are altered by human impact on ecosystems (Cardinale et al 2012)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call