Abstract

The aim of the present study was to use an in vitro–in silico approach to predict the in vivo acute liver toxicity of monocrotaline and to characterize the influence of its metabolism on its relative toxic potency compared to lasiocarpine and riddelliine. In the absence of data on acute liver toxicity of monocrotaline upon oral exposure, the predicted dose–response curve for acute liver toxicity in rats and the resulting benchmark dose lower and upper confidence limits for 10% effect (BMDL10 and BMDU10) were compared to data obtained in studies with intraperitoneal or subcutaneous dosing regimens. This indicated the predicted BMDL10 value to be in line with the no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) derived from availabe in vivo studies. The predicted BMDL10–BMDU10 of 1.1–4.9 mg/kg bw/day also matched the oral dose range of 1–3 mg PA/kg bw/day at which adverse effects in human are reported. A comparison to the oral toxicity of the related pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) lasiocarpine and riddelliine revealed that, although in the rat hepatocytes monocrotaline was less toxic than lasiocarpine and riddelliine, due to its relatively inefficient clearance, its in vivo acute liver toxicity was predicted to be comparable. It is concluded that the combined in vitro-PBK modeling approach can provide insight in monocrotaline-induced acute liver toxicity in rats, thereby filling existing gaps in the database on PA toxicity. Furthermore, the results reveal that the kinetic and metabolic properties of PAs can vary substantially and should be taken into account when considering differences in relative potency between different PAs.

Highlights

  • Monocrotaline (Fig. 1) is a secondary metabolite that belongs to a group of cyclic di-ester 1,2-unsaturated pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs)

  • EFSA (2017) listed monocrotaline as one of the 17 PAs to be monitored for their presence in food and feed because of possible concern for human health related to exposure to these PAs via food including consumption of tea and herbal infusions

  • We reported the development and evaluation of physiologically based kinetic (PBK) models for the PAs lasiocarpine and riddelliine for rat and human, and their use for conversion of in vitro data for toxicity in primary hepatocytes to quantitatively predict in vivo acute liver toxicity for both rat and human (Chen et al 2018; Ning et al 2019)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Monocrotaline (Fig. 1) is a secondary metabolite that belongs to a group of cyclic di-ester 1,2-unsaturated pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs). It is naturally present in Crotalaria species including Crotalaria spectabilis, C. sagittalis L., C. retusa L., and C. aegyptiaca Beth EFSA (2017) listed monocrotaline as one of the 17 PAs to be monitored for their presence in food and feed because of possible concern for human health related to exposure to these PAs via food including consumption of tea and herbal infusions. PAs including monocrotaline are of concern because of their hepatotoxicity and the fact that they are genotoxic carcinogens (EFSA 2017). Monocrotaline is categorized as being possibly carcinogenic in humans (category 2B) (IARC 2019)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call